Violation of public order

“MONA LISA” May Smile At You

2021年6月27日Article 4(1)(vii), JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, MONA LISA, public order, refusal appeal, trademark examination guideline, trademark examination manualArticle 4(1)(vii), Famous mark, Katakana, Refusal appeal, Trademark Examination Guideline, Trademark Examination Manuals, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

In a recent decision, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) disaffirmed the examiner’s refusal and accepted for registration of the world-famous painting, ‘Mona Lisa’ by Leonardo da Vinci.[Appeal case no. 2020-9377, Gazette...

The University of Oxford Failed in Opposition Against “OXFORD” mark

2021年1月10日Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(viii), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, geographical indication, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, Oxford, similarity of mark, Trademark opposition, University of OxfordAbbreviation, Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(viii), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Composite mark, Famous mark, Geographical indication, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) dismissed an opposition filed by Oxford Limited against trademark registration no. 6164941 for composite mark comprised of term “OXFORD” and a square X symbol in class 25, 35,40 by...

Never Register “BOND GIRL” Never Again

2020年5月16日007, Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Bond Girl, invalidation trial, James Bond, public order, Trademark oppositionArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, Invalidation trial, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

In a recent administrative decision, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) sided with Danjaq, LLC, and declared invalidation of a wordmark “BOND GIRL” written in a Japanese katakana character in contravention...

Adidas defeated in 3-stripe trademark dispute

2020年3月20日Adidas, Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, resistance, Three stripes, Trademark opposition, Ultra music festivalArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Device mark, Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) held in an opposition filed by Adidas AG that trademark registration no. 6085087 for horizontal three-stripes (Opposed mark) shall remain as valid as ever and entirely dismissed Adidas’...

Adidas unsuccessful in an attempt to prevent trademark protection for two-stripes

2019年9月8日Adidas, Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, Three stripes, Trademark oppositionArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Device mark, Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

The Opposition Board of Japan Patent Office (JPO) held in an opposition filed by Adidas AG that trademark registration no. 6016240 for two-stripes device (Opposed mark) shall remain as valid as ever and entirely dismissed...

PUMA’s Fight Against Logo Parody

2019年8月25日Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), invalidation trial, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, KUMA, Likelihood of confusion, MARKS IP LAW FIRM, PUMAArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Article 46, Composite mark, Famous mark, Invalidation trial, Likelihood of confusion, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public order, 未分類Masaki MIKAMI

On August 1, 2019, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) decided to invalidate trademark registration no. 5861923 for composite mark consisting of a word “KUMA”, which means ‘bear’ in Japanese, and the bear device by...

PUMA Triumphs in Trademark Battle over Iconic Jumping Cat Logo

2019年4月28日Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), invalidation trial, IP High Court, Jumping Cat, Likelihood of confusion, PUMA, PUMA Jumping Cat Logo, Trademark opposition, Trademark ParodyArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Device mark, Famous mark, Invalidation trial, IP High Court, Likelihood of confusion, Violation of public order1 CommentMasaki MIKAMI

After eight years of prolonged dispute, PUMA SE could achieve a victory over trademark battle involving famous its iconic jumping cat logo. The Japan IP High Court has overturned decisions by the Japan Patent Office (JPO) which said that a...

Is Marie-Antoinette a name of French Queen consort or a trademark?

2019年2月16日Article 4(1)(vii), invalidation trial, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, marie antoinetteArticle 4(1)(vii), Famous mark, Invalidation trial, Violation of public order1 CommentMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) ordered to dismiss an invalidation trial against IR no. 1238820 for word mark “Marie-Antoinette” by finding the mark shall be irrevocable under Article 4(1)(vii) of the Trademark Law. [case no....

SEGWAY unsuccessful in opposing SWAGWAY mark

2018年12月9日Likelihood of confusion, Segway, SWAGWAY, Trademark oppositionArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(x), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office dismissed a trademark opposition claimed by an American manufacturer of two-wheeled personal transporters, Segway Inc. against trademark registration no. 5910587 for the Swagway mark in class 12 by finding less likelihood...

Adidas Fails in Trademark Battle over Adidas Trefoil Logo

2018年5月4日Adidas, Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), international faith, Likelihood of confusion, Trademark opposition, Trefoil logoArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xv), Composite mark, Device mark, Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Trademark Opposition, Violation of public orderMasaki MIKAMI

The Opposition Board of Japan Patent Office (JPO) held in an opposition filed by Adidas AG (Opponent) that trademark registration no. 5897540 for the XIAT device mark (Opposed mark) shall remain as valid as ever and entirely dismissed Adidas’...

MARKS IP LAW FIRM

Subscribe and Follow