Article 4(1)(xi)

Isn’t it MIRACLE?

2021年9月19日A&H Sportswear, Article 4(1)(xi), japan, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, MIRACLE, MIRACLEBODY, MIRACLESUIT, prominent portion, similarity of mark, trademark, Trademark opposition, trademark similarityAlphabetical word, Article 4(1)(xi), Composite mark, Similarity of goods, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Trademark RegistrationMasaki MIKAMI

In recent administrative decision, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) decided TM Reg no. 6253344 for wordmark “Miracle Volume” is dissimilar to senior registered mark “MIRACLESUIT” and “MIRACLEBODY” and dismissed...

HUGO BOSS Unsuccessful in Blocking “BOSS”

2021年9月11日Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), BOSS, HUGO BOSS, japan, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, Rakuten, similarity of mark, trademark, Trademark opposition, trademark similarityAbbreviation, Alphabetical word, Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Similarity of service, Trademark OppositionMasaki MIKAMI

German luxury fashion house Hugo Boss failed in their attempt to block Japanese TM Reg no. 6218609 for word mark “BOSS” on SaaS and order processing services.

<!-- wp:paragraph...

No confusion between WeWork and iWork

2021年8月29日Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), iWork, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, similarity of mark, Trademark opposition, trademark similarity, WeWorkAlphabetical word, Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), Composite mark, Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark OppositionMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) dismissed a trademark opposition claimed by WeWork Companies Inc. against Japanese trademark registration no. 6271212 for wordmark “iWork” by finding less likelihood of confusion with...

Dot Makes Wordmark Dissimilar

2021年8月22日.NEXT, Article 4(1)(xi), Dot, Examiner, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, JPO, NEXT, similarity of mark, trademark appeal, trademark similarityAlphabetical word, Article 4(1)(xi), Madrid Protocol, Similarity of mark, Similarity of service, Trademark AppealMasaki MIKAMI

In a trademark dispute pertinent to the similarity between “.NEXT” and “NEXT”, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) found both marks dissimilar and reversed examiner’s rejection.

<!--...

JPO found likelihood of confusion between SONY and SONICODE

2021年8月15日Article 4(1)(x), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, invalidation trial, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, similarity of mark, SONICODE, SONY, Trademark oppositionAlphabetical word, Article 4(1)(x), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, Invalidation trial, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Trademark RegistrationMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office sided with Sony Corporation and declared invalidation of TM Registration no. 5764615 for wordmark “SONICODE” due to a likelihood of confusion with “SONY”.

<!--...

Trademark Dispute over “RED HOT”

2021年7月24日Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), FRANK'S REDHOT, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Likelihood of confusion, REDHOT, Similarity of goods, Trademark oppositionArticle 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), Composite mark, Famous mark, Katakana, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of goods, Similarity of mark, Trademark Opposition, Trademark RegistrationMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) dismissed trademark opposition against wordmark “REDHOT” written in Katakana character opposed by The French's Food Company LLC who owns senior trademark “REDHOT” and “FRANK’S...

Failed Trademark Opposition by Ferrari over Prancing Horse Logo

2021年7月4日Article 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, Ferrari, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, Prancing horse logo, similarity of mark, Trademark oppositionArticle 4(1)(vii), Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Composite mark, Device mark, Famous mark, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of mark, Trademark OppositionMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) dismissed a trademark opposition claimed by the Italian luxury sports car manufacturer, Ferrari S.p.A. against Japanese trademark registration no. 6261005 by finding less likelihood of...

JPO found Italian word “Panetteria” distinctive in relation to restaurant service

2021年6月13日ARIETTA, Article 4(1)(xi), JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Panetteria, similarity of mark, trademark appealAlphabetical word, Article 4(1)(xi), compound mark, Katakana, Similarity of mark, Similarity of service, Trademark Appeal, Trademark RegistrationMasaki MIKAMI

In a recent administrative decision, the Appeal Board of the Japan Patent Office (JPO) disaffirmed the examiner’s refusal and found “Panetteria ARIETTA” and “ARIETTA" are dissimilar by virtue of distinctiveness of...

Glenfiddich Wins Trademark Dispute Over Deer Design

2021年5月30日Article 4(1)(xi), Black Forest, Deer design, Glenfiddich, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, similarity of mark, Stag head, Trademark oppositionArticle 4(1)(xi), Composite mark, Device mark, Similarity of goods, Similarity of mark, Trademark OppositionMasaki MIKAMI

The Japan Patent Office (JPO) sided with Glenfiddich, the world's most awarded Single Malt Scotch Whisky, who fought against trademark registration for the BLACK FOREST composite mark in class 33 due to close resemblance...

Trademark Similarity: APLAY vs applay

2021年5月15日APLAY, applay, Article 4(1)(xi), Dissimilarity of mark, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, similarity of mark, trademark, trademark appeal, trademark similarityAlphabetical word, Article 4(1)(xi), compound mark, Similarity of goods, Similarity of mark, Trademark Appeal, Trademark RegistrationMasaki MIKAMI

In a trademark dispute pertinent to the similarity between “APLAY” and “applay”, the Appeal Board of the Japan Patent Office found both marks dissimilar and reversed the examiner’s rejection.[Appeal case no....

MARKS IP LAW FIRM

Subscribe and Follow