Menu

MARKS IP LAW FIRM

Japanese IP Attorney Firm specializing in Trademarks with a commitment to excellence

MARKS IP LAW FIRM
Facebook Email LinkedIn Instagram

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Attorney
    • Achievements
    • Honors & Awards
  • Practice Areas
    • TRADEMARK
    • TRADE DRESS
    • INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
    • COPYRIGHT
  • Trademark Services
    • Search & Selection
    • Trademark Application
    • Office Action
    • Opposition / Invalidation
    • Renewals
    • Non-Use Cancellation
    • Contract & License
    • Watching & Surveillance
    • Portfolio Management
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Domain Dispute
    • Customs Enforcement
  • Trademark Updates
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • FAQs
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
    • Office Locations
Search

A trademark dispute over Apple logo

Posted on2022年2月5日2022年2月17日AuthorMasaki MIKAMI

On January 13, 2022, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) dismissed an invalidation action filed by Apple Inc. against TM Reg no. 5770529 for device mark by finding an unlikelihood of confusion with the famous Apple design mark.

[Invalidation case no. 2020-890049]

Disputed mark

Shelly Co., Ltd applied device mark (see below) for registration to be used on protection covers and cases for smartphones, protection covers and cases for tablets, cases for laptops in class 9 with the JPO on January 20, 2015.

The mark was registered on June 12, 2015, without receiving a refusal during the substantive examination.


Invalidation action

Japan Trademark Law has a provision to retroactively invalidate trademark registration for certain restricted reasons specified under Article 46 (1) provided that the interested party files an invalidation petition within a five-year statute of limitations.

Apple Inc. filed a petition for invalidation against the disputed mark on June 12, 2020. Apple argued the mark shall be invalidated in contravention of Article 4(1)(xv) of the Trademark Law due to a likelihood of confusion with its famous “bitten apple” logo (see below) when used on all goods in class 9.

Article 4(1)(xv) provides that a mark shall not be registered where it is likely to cause confusion with other business entities’ well-known goods or services, to the benefit of brand owners and users.


JPO decision

The JPO did not question a remarkable degree of reputation and popularity of the Apple logo as a source indicator of Apple Inc. in connection with personal computers, smartphones, and any goods and services related to them.

In the meantime, the JPO found the disputed mark is dissimilar to the Apple logo. Because of a low degree of similarity, relevant consumers are unlikely to cause confusion with Apple Inc. when the disputed mark is used on the goods in question by stating that:

  1. From appearance, both marks are obviously dissimilar. Provided that it is adequate to rotate the disputed mark 90 degrees to the left and compare it with the Apple logo, the Board still has a reasonable ground to believe both marks are visually dissimilar because of distinctive features in detail and overall appearance.
  2. Both the disputed mark and the Apple logo would not give rise to any specific sound. If so, the marks are not comparable in pronunciation.
  3. The Apple logo gives rise to a meaning of “famous source indicator of Apple Inc.”. The disputed mark has no meaning. Therefore, both marks are dissimilar in concept.

Based on the foregoing, regardless of the famousness of the Apple logo and close association between the goods in question with Apple’s business and relevant consumers, the Board decided to dismiss the invalidation action.

Categories2022, Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xix), Article 4(1)(xv), Device mark, Famous mark, Invalidation trial, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of goods, Similarity of markTagsApple, Apple Inc., Apple logo, Article 4(1)(xi), Article 4(1)(xv), Famous mark, invalidation trial, JAPAN PATENT OFFICE, Japan Trademark Law, Likelihood of confusion, similarity of mark

投稿ナビゲーション

← Previous Previous post: DIOR Successful in Blocking Trademark “zovladior”
Next → Next post: JPO Found Lego 3D Figure Mark Lack Distinctiveness

Recent Posts

  • IP High Court Rules Lego 3D Figure Mark Unregistrable2023年2月4日
    The Japan IP High Court dismissed an appeal brought by Lego Juris A/S and affirmed the Japan Patent Office (JP Read More ...
  • “OLYMPIAD vs OLYMBEER” trademark battle2023年1月29日
    The Japan IP High Court reversed a decision of the JPO that canceled the OLYMBEER mark due to its similarity t Read More ...
  • Louboutin 2nd Defeat in Litigation over Red Soles2023年1月22日
    By order of December 26, 2022, the IP High Court ruled to dismiss an appeal taken by Louboutin against the Tok Read More ...

Menu

Location / Contact information

MARKS IP LAW FIRM
OSAKA [Main Office]
2F iPLUS Edobori, 1-9-11 Edobori Nishi-ku, Osaka, 550-0002, Japan

TOKYO [Group Office]
9292 Bldg., 3-1-8 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0062, Japan

T: +81 6 6467 8334
F: +81 6 6467 8335
E: info@marks-iplaw.jp

 

ATTORNEY’S LINKEDIN

Masaki Mikami
Copyright © 2023 MARKS IP LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved.
Scroll Up
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Attorney
    • Achievements
    • Honors & Awards
  • Practice Areas
    • TRADEMARK
    • TRADE DRESS
    • INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
    • COPYRIGHT
  • Trademark Services
    • Search & Selection
    • Trademark Application
    • Office Action
    • Opposition / Invalidation
    • Renewals
    • Non-Use Cancellation
    • Contract & License
    • Watching & Surveillance
    • Portfolio Management
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Domain Dispute
    • Customs Enforcement
  • Trademark Updates
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • FAQs
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
    • Office Locations